Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 2721 - 2740 of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 5:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Workers’ Compensation Law § 29(1) provides that, if an employee who is eligible for workers’ compensation benefits is injured “by the negligence or wrong of another not in the same employ, such injured employee . . . [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:06 am
Foy KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant's Jail Term Does Not Exceed 90 Days; Defendant Not Entitled to Pre-Sentence Report People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:19 pm
SUFFOLK COUNTYFamily Law Mother's Bid to Change Child's Surname Denied; CRL §62(1) Notice Requirements Not Satisfied Matter of Mack U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Sec'y Veterans Affairs, No. 2007-7008 38 C.F.R. section 1.218(a)(14), which governs the conduct of visitors on property under the charge and control of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and prohibits visitors to VA property from engaging in "demonstrations" unless authorized by the head of the facility involved, was validly promulgated and does not on its face violate the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Sarah Sutherland
It does make sense that it’s happening now. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:40 am by Matrix Law
A provision of a Bill will be outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament and therefore not law if it relates to the matters which have been reserved to the United Kingdom Parliament in Westminster (sections 29(1) and (2)(b)). [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The statement of claim was filed on January 29, 2013. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:01 pm by Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter
(1:58:31 PM) Adrian Lamo [AUTO-REPLY]: Tired of being tired (2:17:29 PM) Manning: ? [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In considering this issue of first impression, the Court sided with the County reasoning that the FMP does not violate the statute’s prohibition against conditioning the issuance of an approval on the grant of a conservation easement because the applicant and/or developer is not required to grant the easement. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In considering this issue of first impression, the Court sided with the County reasoning that the FMP does not violate the statute’s prohibition against conditioning the issuance of an approval on the grant of a conservation easement because the applicant and/or developer is not required to grant the easement. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:24 am by Steve Hall
Texas legislative leaders rolled out the draft budget for the two year period beginning September 1, 2011. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:22 am by Linda R. Evers
Opening Briefs on the questions raised by the Commission are due June 29, 2012, and Reply Briefs on July 13, 2012. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:37 pm
On Ayers: The Republican base seems fine with the attacks but no one else does: Just 29 percent of moderates, 12 percent of liberals and 10 percent of Democrats agree. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:31 am by Laura A. Stutz
The law does not require businesses to build new single-occupant restrooms, nor does it affect larger restrooms with multiple single-stalls. [read post]