Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
On 30 March 2022 there was an application in the case of Watkins -v- Mackle. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
" State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
" State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 3:13 am
Nor can the irrelevance of section 54 to passing off actions be stated without some rigorous explanation. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
" However, in the one case where the matter has been argued, the result was inconclusive (Francis Day & Hunter Ltd v Bron [1963] Ch. 587.) [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 3:26 am
This was developed upon in Kogan v Martin [2017] EWHC 2927 (IPEC), which concerned joint authorship in a film screenplay, which was held to be "more accurately described as a dramatic work, as its primary purpose lies in being performed, as opposed to being read, like a novel. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
However, he stated categorically that this is not compulsory when instructing experts, and accepted that it can be costly and can in certain circumstances be an impossible approach. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 11:04 am
From Special Counsel Jack Smith's filing in U.S. v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 6:47 pm
"As the Supreme Court held in the 1993 Wisconsin v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:53 pm
But what about, say, the Blogger platform considered in Tamiz v Google and Davison v Habeeb? [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 4:20 pm
Hirchak v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 9:04 pm
But experts say that the Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 3:32 am
Similar admiralty jurisdiction to arrest a vessel exists in many other countries and is often based on one of the two international conventions, the 1952 Arrest Convention and the 1999 Arrest Convention, whereby states have agreed to rules that shall apply to the arrest of vessels of other contracting states present in the arresting state’s jurisdiction and may apply them to other vessels. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
In addition, the authority of local and state regulatory agencies will be usurped by the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Similarly, even inferior courts in England and Wales are under an obligation to rely upon a rule of European Community (“EC”) law that is irreconcilable with national law. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:30 am
However, the context in which that case was decided was the prior decision of the Court of Appeal in Sabah Shipyard v Government of Pakistan, where the court had granted an anti-suit injunction restraining certain proceedings in Pakistan even though England was the subject of a non-exclusive jurisdiction clause. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm
Religion is increasingly finding its way into the libel courts in England and Wales, and it’s not surprising. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:49 pm
Superior Court and Brinkley v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 4:18 pm
524/06 Heinz Huber v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
It proposes making Sullivan better with two concrete, constitutionally mandated modifications to the existing doctrine, to bring it more in line libel law in other common-law countries like England, Australia, and New Zealand. [read post]
