Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 11,207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2019, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 5:57 am
House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Investor Protection, Entrepreneurship and Capital Markets Posted by James Andrus, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, on Monday, July 15, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, CalPERS, Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:39 am
The English Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in ZyXEL v TQ Delta [2019] EWCA Civ 1277. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:44 am
Along with Mr Storey, it is a defendant in a claim [IP-2019-000064] recently issued in the English High Court by Red Bull GmbH (RBG), owner of Haas' rival F1 team Red Bull Racing. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
For this last week: Blake v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 4:36 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
The case primarily rested on how a skilled person would interpret the sketchy results and conclusions presented in the abstract.An interesting point that arose was whether "the state of the art" was the abstract in Japanese or the English translation of the abstract. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:08 pm
”]; Flores v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 9:37 pm
It includes an analysis of the "Census Question" case: Department of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm
In Case C-722/17 Reitbauer (decided last Wednesday but still not available in English), the Court confirmed its decision in Feniks, according to which such an action falls under Art 7(1) Brussels Ia if it is based on a contractual right. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 1:44 pm
Under English law, for a restrictive covenant to be upheld, it must (1) seek to protect the employer’s legitimate business […] [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
The first is that probably the four highest profile design cases in the UK in recent years (Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936, Dyson v Vax [2011] EWCA Civ 1206, Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, and PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12 (i.e. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am
When Congress passed the Federal Liability Risk Retention Act of 1986 in response to skyrocketing insurance premiums being charged for, and the lack of available, commercial liability insurance, a new regime was born. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
In December 2016, the company’s appeal against that decision was rejected by the Fifth Board of Appeal of the EUIPO (the contested decision), which considered that the pronunciation of the first two words ‘Fack ju’ would be perceived by the relevant public almost indistinguishable from that of the English expression ‘Fuck you’. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Hoddle v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
In Bi v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm
The last time an English sovereign appeared in court was Charles I in 1649, with terminal consequences. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 11:45 pm
Merritt v. [read post]
