Search for: "Estate of Lease" Results 2721 - 2740 of 6,088
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:13 pm by Lax & Neville LLP
Block (“Block”) and Lisa Pavelka McAlister (“McAlister”) relating to an alleged 2014 fraud that inflated the value of the largest publicly traded net lease real estate investment trust (“REIT”), American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:13 pm by Lax & Neville LLP
Block (“Block”) and Lisa Pavelka McAlister (“McAlister”) relating to an alleged 2014 fraud that inflated the value of the largest publicly traded net lease real estate investment trust (“REIT”), American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:18 am by Liskow & Lewis
The Court of Appeals rejected BP’s argument that the top lease violated the Rule, explaining that the top lease conveyed a presently vested interest (i.e., the landowners’ reversionary interest in the mineral estate) as opposed to an interest that cannot vest until a condition precedent occurs (i.e., the expiration of the existing lease), and therefore was not subject to the Rule. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:18 am by Jillian Marullo
The Court of Appeals rejected BP’s argument that the top lease violated the Rule, explaining that the top lease conveyed a presently vested interest (i.e., the landowners’ reversionary interest in the mineral estate) as opposed to an interest that cannot vest until a condition precedent occurs (i.e., the expiration of the existing lease), and therefore was not subject to the Rule. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:18 am by Jillian Marullo
The Court of Appeals rejected BP’s argument that the top lease violated the Rule, explaining that the top lease conveyed a presently vested interest (i.e., the landowners’ reversionary interest in the mineral estate) as opposed to an interest that cannot vest until a condition precedent occurs (i.e., the expiration of the existing lease), and therefore was not subject to the Rule. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:02 am by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 1:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:17 pm by Daily Record Staff
He will be responsible for all leasing, development and operations of the company. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 4:30 am by Spadea Law
Taxes: This is pretty straightforward, as the landlord will simply pass on to the tenant the real estate taxes proportionately based on the size of the overall property and the size of the tenant’s location. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 10:38 am by Stuart Kaplow
I have been quoted saying that PACE “could be bigger than anything in U.S. real estate since the invention of the glass window. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 4:21 am by Ray Garcia
If your intended arrangement is not properly communicated in the lease or purchase contract, you could end up in some legal trouble. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed August 31, 2016, the Sixth Appellate District Court of Appeal rejected claims under CEQA and the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (“SMARA”; Pub. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Without more details or some facts from the BIA or the other side of the transaction, one could conclude that Small is a real estate opportunist. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 6:45 am by Sherin and Lodgen
Terms and conditions of anchor lease should be consistent with small shop leases Finally, Landlords should make sure that the terms and conditions of the anchor lease regarding opening and continuous operation are consistent with the co-tenancy provisions in its small shop leases. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 6:45 am by Sherin and Lodgen
Terms and conditions of anchor lease should be consistent with small shop leases Finally, Landlords should make sure that the terms and conditions of the anchor lease regarding opening and continuous operation are consistent with the co-tenancy provisions in its small shop leases. [read post]