Search for: "Fee v. Fee" Results 2721 - 2740 of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2009, 2:30 am
  To support those claims, the plaintiffs argued that the fees charged to the funds failed the “reasonableness” test originally set forth in Gartenberg v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:01 am by Docket Navigator
The court ordered the parties to submit supplemental simultaneous briefing regarding defendants' motion for attorneys' fees following the recent Supreme Court decisions in Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 12:51 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch I previously wrote about the case of Bank v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm by Patricia Hughes
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:10 am by John O'Sullivan
The judge found the fees charged “greatly exceed” what he viewed as fair and reasonable. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]