Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 2721 - 2740 of 37,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2009, 11:23 am
Dorozhko further illustrates the uncertain state of the limits of insider trading. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:22 pm by David Cheifetz
Antrim Truck Centre Ltd v Ontario (Minister Of Transportation)" (2011) 90 Can Bar Rev 215. [read post]
”  They claim that viewing EWA products as something other than “credit” leads to evasion of federal credit laws such as TILA, and of state laws, particularly state usury laws. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm by Eric Schweibenz
On March 10, 2011, the Federal Circuit is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Tianrui Group Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:46 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Brian Murphy and Jonathan Sokolowski On May 29, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Cuevas v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:04 am by Aurora Barnes
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 18-1269 Issue: Whether courts should determine ownership of a tax refund paid to an affiliated group based on the federal common law “Bob Richards rule,” as three circuits hold, or based on the law of the relevant state, as four circuits hold. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 10:30 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The University of Chicago no longer is in danger of losing ancient Iranian artifacts following Wednesday's United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
CareFlite Accessing an Employee’s Facebook Posts by “Shoulder Surfing” a Coworker’s Page States Privacy Claim — Ehling v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am by Andrew Hamm
” Banning the licensing of female bartenders served the purposes of both groups. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:24 am by Marta Requejo
Or as Justice Story puts it: “No nation has ever yet pretended to be the custos morum of the whole world…” (United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
” The group brought suit against the State of Texas, arguing that the state infringed upon its free-speech rights, found in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]