Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 61,428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 8:37 am
On March 21, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 2:36 pm
On June 26, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order granting rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:31 am
They agree that Congress could do so, although depart over whether Congress could grant the immunity in federal court only (Blackman) or federal and state court (Dorf). [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Being on the State or a participating employer’s payroll determines eligibility for member service credit in the State's Employees' Retirement SystemMatter of Muccia v DiNapoli, 2010 NY Slip Op 00630, Decided and Entered: January 28, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentMargaret M. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:15 am
However, the Court has held that the feds may not commandeer the cooperation of state agents, in Mack and Printz v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
First, it re-states state law on this point. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am
[I’ll blog the Supreme Court’s cert grant in Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 8:52 am
In Department of Education v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:50 am
State of Michigan v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:44 am
See Senju Pharmaceutical Co., et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:02 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 10:07 pm
(Williams v State of Wyoming, (WyoSupCt, April 21, 2009), demonstrates that some of these cases can be quite interesting as well. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:02 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 3:24 pm
” The court disagreed, and found that because a preemptive state statute grants Slusarczyk the right to indicate for whom parking is restricted or prohibited on his property, the City of Eagle River cannot restrict that right by requiring Slusarczyk to first obtain a conditional grant. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:26 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:05 am
TechnoLines, LP v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Many thanks to the blog reader who pointed out that on June 25, in addition to granting cert. on limited issues in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
