Search for: "High v State"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 35,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2008, 5:48 am
(In the following post, our guest contributor Karthik Seshadri examines the issue of misrepresentation arising out of the judgment of the Madras High Court in Rajshree Sugars v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 11:35 am
Convictions that are not only affirmed at the state level, but at the federal habeas level as well.I'd have never thought that a street gang would be so bold (or stupid) to deliberately ambush and try to kill police officers in order to escape a high-speed case. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
Vombatkere v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
Supreme Court Gnango, R. v [2011] UKSC 59 (14 December 2011) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor [2011] UKSC 60 (14 December 2011) Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 58 (14 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Revenue And Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership [2011] EWCA Civ 1578 (20 December 2011) Ablyazov & Ors v JSC BTA Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 1588 (20 December… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 am
We noted round 1 of Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State back in November (see our note here) in which the High Court found that Mr Pickles could not abolish Regional Strategies (e.g. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 am
We noted round 1 of Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State back in November (see our note here) in which the High Court found that Mr Pickles could not abolish Regional Strategies (e.g. [read post]
17 May 2008, 8:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:46 am
The court awards $91k of fees to the defendant (how did this amount get so high?). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:55 am
On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Glacier Northwest, Inc., dba Calportland v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
Proposition 208 (2020) had created a 3.5 percent high earners tax atop the state’s existing 4.5 percent top marginal income tax rate, functionally yielding a new top rate of 8 percent, with the additional proceeds earmarked for education. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 am
In Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D.Mich.) [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
The granting of an order unlimited in point of time could not have been justified by proper disclosure (Brinks Mat Ltd v Elcombe [1988] 1 WLR 1350, 1357). (3) However, the Restraint Order was re-granted but with effect from 29 July 2009, making it later in time than the date on which SIB was wound up by the High Court of Antigua. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:05 pm
The state Supreme Court held in Attorney General v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:13 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tullett Prebon Plc & Ors v BGC Brokers LP & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 131 (22 February 2011) Baxter v Mannion [2011] EWCA Civ 120 (22 February 2011) PO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 132 (22 February 2011) Goad v Butcher & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 158 (22 February 2011) Bateman, R (on the application of) v South Cambridgeshire District Council [2011] EWCA Civ 157 (22… [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:49 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
” In an 1888 case called Banks v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:38 pm
The case before the high Court, LeBron v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:09 am
The case, State v Dwight Lynch, unfolded over four intense days in the courtroom. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:30 am
February 2 roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
