Search for: "In Re Stevens"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 5,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2007, 8:48 pm
Rockefeller Professor of Public Affairs at Princeton University would doubtless find my solicitude icky.I know what you're asking: Who, exactly, was Laurance S. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
So many civil liberties need to be won and re-won worldwide. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
" Responding to a question from Justice Stevens, Mr. [read post]
6 May 2015, 6:30 am
We’re collaborating, as usual, on this blog, and we’re excited to have an outlet to share our latest thinking on turning data into insights and helping transform those insights into innovative, customized solutions. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 10:27 am
You're unlikely to sit through the whole thing, as we did. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
Even if they're not partisan hacks, they're hardly apolitical.Why does it matter that the Justices are misleading the public? [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:44 am
That’s why we’re happy the Power Ventures ruling, while claiming to be consistent with Nosal II, appears to have taken a step back from that bad result. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 8:27 am
If you’re selling merchandise: worry. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:30 am
They’re savvier consumers than most adults. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 5:31 am
In fact, the CCA had re-affirmed the use of bite-mark evidence as recently as 2012. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am
AH: They’re listening. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:50 am
Stevens said in his testimony. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:22 am
If you’re a judge and you think the gerrymander before you stinks to high heaven, the Court is saying, don’t let that distract you. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:57 am
Background At the times relevant to this dispute, Steven Brasner was a life insurance agent who procured life insurance policies intending to sell the policies to third party investors. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
’ And no, we’re not—we’re not doing that. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:47 pm
On then to my own evaluation of the First Amendment articles: I think they’re excellent. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
"Society changes," wrote Stevens. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am
” Finally, Justice Stevens also objected to the way the ruling avoided the rule of judicial restraint. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:31 pm
The majority's contrary interpretation, which relies on student population, is - according to Justice Scalia - "sheer applesauce" (if you're still reading, do you have any idea where that phrase comes from?) [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
” Retired Justice John Paul Stevens spoke at the American Bar Association’s annual meeting; James Podgers of the ABA Journal reports that Stevens “singled out Chief Justice John G. [read post]
