Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 2721 - 2740
of 18,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2009, 5:46 am
Court of Appeal Decision On Tuesday Chief Justice MacDonald released the Court of Appeal’s decision in Hartling v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:30 am
Dogs, after all, can bark and bite, so maybe the officer should indeed know whether they're there.Nonetheless, while Chief Justice George mentions "dogs" 15+ times, as I was reading the opinion, I kept looking for any example other than dogs. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm
Marinello v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 12:55 pm
This case comes out the way I thought it would, but not for the reasons I anticipated.The underlying facts aren't particularly relevant (unless you're particularly interested in dredging and/or the requirements of the federal Jones Act); instead, it's really just the procedural history at stake. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 12:48 pm
(In case you're wondering what it's actually about, here's Justice Guerrero's helpful synopsis: "The California Sales and Use Tax Law (Rev. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
The transcript of oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:35 am
York v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:13 pm
Today, we're sure that those on the regulatory side of the table are doing just that, because the Court declined to review the Third Circuit's decision in R&J Holding Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:46 pm
Does anyone think Justice Sotomayor is going to join forces with the more liberal justices on these cases? [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
The recent decision of Justice Fuerst in R v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:52 am
The case is Gintec International Import-Export GmbH v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm
Anyway, we’re glad to hear that Justice Thomas enjoyed himself at the argument — even though we’re disappointed he didn’t ask a question. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
You're not alone, according to Casey Flaherty. [3 Geeks and a Law Blog] [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:07 pm
See, for example, Justice Breyer's courageous dissent in Glossip v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:43 pm
It describes how the Irish State continued to enforce national data retention law for six years after Tele2 Sverige confirmed its illegality, attempted to re-litigate the legality of indiscriminate data retention before the national courts, and reformed domestic law only when forced to act by the CJEU decision in GD v Commissioner of An Garda Síochána. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 7:11 pm
Galligan, Re-theorising the genocide–ecocide nexus: Raphael Lemkin and ecocide in the Amazon Melissa Farley, Making the connections: resource extraction, prostitution, poverty, climate change, and human rights Stefano Angeleri, Access to health care for Venezuelan irregular migrants in Colombia: between constitutional adjudication and human rights law Anushka Sehmi, Emphasising socio-economic narratives of truth, justice and reparations in The Prosecutor v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:57 am
Time to go back through Perry's vetoes on criminal-justice reform over the years to see what might be revived under a different chief executive.For me, the biggest one that jumps out was Perry's veto of two different legislative fixes to the US Supreme Court's ruling in Atwater v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:28 am
Well, it has been a long, strange trip for Barrick v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 2:01 pm
You’re looking fabulous. [read post]
