Search for: "J Thomas" Results 2721 - 2740 of 8,901
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Securing the Homeland in the Post-Post 9/11 EraJohn Kelly, Secretary of Homeland Security Moderator: Pete Williams, Justice Correspondent, NBC News   No Room for Error: Advising the President on Homeland Security and CounterterrorismThomas Bossert, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Moderator: David Sanger, Chief Washington Correspondent, The New York Times   One Off or Turning Point: The Airstrike in SyriaJane Harman, President,… [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Even Thomas Jefferson recognized the difficulty of “drawing a line between the things which are worth to the public the embarrassment of an exclusive patent, and those which are not. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
Hearing on H.R. 2887, the No Regulation Without Representation Act Before the U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  The Reptilian Brain of Jurors Professor of Law Louis J. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
., on Wednesday, July 19, 2017 Tags: Audit committee, Board composition, Boards of Directors, Canada, Compensation disclosure, Diversity, Europe, Institutional Investors, International governance, ISS, Proxy access, Shareholder voting, UK Developments in the Asset Management Industry Posted by Itzhak Ben-David, The Ohio State University, on Thursday, July 20, 2017 Tags: Arbitrage, Asset management, Capital… [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On Friday the Government announced that Sir Ian Burnett has been appointed as the new Lord Chief Justice, to replace the retiring Lord Thomas from the 2 October 2017. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 5:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Wildenthal Thomas Jefferson School of Law  Indigenizing EqualityYale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2017M. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Washington state criminalizes (among other things) “mak[ing] an electronic communication to … a third party” “with intent to harass, … torment, or embarrass any other person” if the communication is made “[a]nonymously or repeatedly. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am by Randy Barnett
In this post, I replied to this op-ed by Duquesne law professor Bruce Ledewitz, who has now responded with this lengthy blog post of his own. [read post]