Search for: "King v. King"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 8,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2008, 6:30 am
In Frankel v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:12 am
As we mentioned previously, that issue is currently pending in the Alabama Supreme Court in Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:07 am
John Cochrane and Stephen Bainbridge on Dodd-Frank reform in a new administration; Gift of insider information to friends or family is insider trading, rules SCOTUS in Salman v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:00 am
Iowa Supreme Court DecisionsApril 23, 2012No. 08–2006 KING; KING; HOUSTON, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of OSTRANDER, FLOOD III; DRAKE, Individually and as Motherand Next Friend of LUHMANN, MAULE, MAULE,MAULE; CAMPBELL, Individually and as Father and Next Friend of CAMPBELL; CAMPBELL; CAMPBELL,Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of RASSO, CAMPBELL, and CAMPBELL v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:07 pm
*Microsoft v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
In Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:10 pm
The justices resume oral arguments on Tuesday, January 16, after observing the Martin Luther King holiday on Monday, January 15. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
However, that court left the act in place pending appeal (Texas v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:10 am
And indeed, the New York Court of Appeals has approved their use, per People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
Finesse Wireless LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:11 am
"Where evidentiary material is submitted on a CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion, it may be considered by the court, but unless the defendant demonstrates, without significant dispute, that a material fact alleged by the complaint is not a fact at all, the motion will not be granted" (Quesada v Global Land, Inc., 35 AD3d 575, 576; see Caravousanos v Kings County Hosp., 74 AD3d 716). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:49 am
"Where evidentiary material is submitted on a CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion, it may be considered by the court, but unless the defendant demonstrates, without significant dispute, that a material fact alleged by the complaint is not a fact at all, the motion will not be granted" (Quesada v Global Land, Inc., 35 AD3d 575, 576; see Caravousanos v Kings County Hosp., 74 AD3d 716). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 6:36 am
Special thanks to Sheridan King, Summer Law Fellow at UNC SOG, for her significant contributions to the research and development of this post. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:54 am
NO-FAULT - NOTICE TO ADMIT - ADMISSIBILITY OF CLAIM FORM AS BUSINESS RECORD Peter Connely D.C. a/a/o Mohammad Kifayeh v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:53 am
In denying that motion, Kings Civil held that plaintiffs had made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment, but that State Farm had created a question of fact in its opposition papers. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 6:46 pm
Dupuy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
King's work. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 8:40 am
Sept. 25, 2024) Prior Tattoo Copyright Blog Posts Videogame Maker Has Implied License to Depict Copyrighted Tattoos–Hayden v. 2K This Blog Has Jumped the Shark: I’m Covering a Copyright Opinion About a Tattoo of Tiger King’s Joe Exotic–Cramer v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm
This discouraged questions from the King’s Proctor, Sir Thomas Barnes, when he was investigating for the High Court whether there had been adultery or collusion between Wallis and the King which – if proved – would have prevented the final divorce decree being granted in 1937. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:25 am
The oral argument in Golan v. [read post]
