Search for: "London v. State"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 1:03 pm
Modaresi v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm
Resonating inside my head are cases such as Kelo vs. the City of New London, Goldstein et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
District Court in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
It was Corzine's stated goal to transform MF Global from a commodity broker into an investment bank with a large proprietary trading operation similar to the one Corzine ran at Goldman in the 1990s. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
As noted in our events section below, the Attorney General will speak at City University London on 1 December. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
(Ilya Somin) Virginia was one of several states that enacted a strong eminent domain reform law after the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:09 am
After the devastating 2005 Supreme Court decision Kelo v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:06 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mousa, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1334 (22 November 2011) Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314 (22 November 2011) London Tara Hotel Ltd v Kensington Close Hotel Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1356 (22 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) AS v London Borough of Croydon [2011] EWHC 2091 (Admin) (25 October 2011) High Court (Chancery Division)… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:45 am
There are significant gaps in services addressing the needs of children and young people living with domestic violence in London.2. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:29 am
Kelo v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:05 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) HM Revenue & Customs v London Clubs Management Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1323 (18 November 2011) San Michael College Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1336 (18 November 2011) Bethell Construction Ltd & Anor v Deloitte and Touche [2011] EWCA Civ 1321 (18 November 2011) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2011] EWCA Civ 1333 (18 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court)… [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm
The M/ V Cape Flattery had run aground on a submerged coral reef off Hawaii; the vessel entered into a salvage agreement with Titan Maritime that contained an arbitration clause: “Any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in London . . .in accordance with the English Arbitration Act 1996 . . ., English law and practice to apply. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
If this Kat were not busying himself tomorrow (Tuesday, that is) in chairing the IP Finance seminar on FRAND licensing, he would be beetling over to the very comfy London office of Allen & Overy, in Bishops Square, to enjoy a rapid response seminar on the UK Supreme Court's extremely recent ruling in Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Earlier in the week, this Kat had the pleasure of participating in a public debate at the Baker & McKenzie premises in London on whether the Meltwater decision (see IPKat here) "marks the end of browsing as we know it". [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:08 pm
My research for the upcoming presentation brought to my attention the case law of Bankway Properties Ltd v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am
City of New London. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a footnote to the IMT… [read post]
