Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 55,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2019, 3:11 pm
Recently, the United States Supreme Court heard the case Mitchell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 1:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 7:29 am
Allegedly, a majority of Roblox users are under 13. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:30 am
Moelis (Feb. 23, 2024); Wagner v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 10:32 pm
The High Court, by a 6-1 majority, in Sons of Gwalia Ltd v Margaretic; ING Investment Management LLC v Margaretic [2007] HCA 1 has dismissed the appeals from the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in Sons of Gwalia Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) v Margaretic [2006] FCAFC 17 which affirmed that an on-market purchaser (as opposed to a subscribing shareholder) of shares can in a winding up prove for damages against the… [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:30 am
Moelis (Feb. 23, 2024); Wagner v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
by Dennis Crouch In Teva v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Here is the language from Shaffer v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 5:48 am
Driver distraction is a major problem in Florida. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:01 am
It is a slow patent news day, but the Supreme Court offered a big employment discrimination decision in Bostick v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:01 am
Sheldon Roberts v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:19 am
This morning, in a highly anticipated decision, a fractured Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit's judgment in Bilski v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 3:06 pm
My colleague Professor Stone characterizes, in his recent post, the five Justices -- who are Roman Catholics -- who were in the majority in Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
On July 13, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published Justice Corrigan’s majority opinion in Holman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:49 am
Wade and Casey v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
by Melbourne Journal of International Law We are grateful to Justine Nolan for her thoughtful comments on the article, and in particular for highlighting two recent circuit court cases – Flomo v Firestone Natural Rubber Co in the Seventh Circuit and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corporation in the DC Circuit – which affirm that corporations can be liable under the Alien Tort Statute (‘ATS’), contrary to the position of the Second Circuit majority in… [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:37 pm
Oregon Dept of Agriculture, where a six-justice majority held that government employees could not challenge employment decisions as equal protection violations under the "class of one" theory of Village of Willowbrook v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 3:27 pm
The EPA argues the Court previously upheld the NOx SIP Call in Michigan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
