Search for: "Matt Doe" Results 2721 - 2740 of 3,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
  On this topic, Matt Herper states “Our ability to detect these drugs is pretty bad,” although he later admits that detection efforts are gaining ground. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 pm
Matt Mitchell of the Mercatus Center attempts to see if states that rely heavily on high-earners see larger budget gaps. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:38 pm by admin
The insurance company does not want you working with public adjusters or lawyers. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:11 am by Kevin Houchin
Dan Pink does a great job explaining this mistake in his bestselling book Drive.If you’re feeling trapped in a job that doesn’t allow you to express your creativity—you have the power to change that, and you are the ONLY one with that power. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:47 am
Below is an interesting Reuters piece by Matt Goldstein which quotes Ross Intelisano regarding securities fraud and Ponzi schemes. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:29 am
In other words, transactional or use immunity does not permit the individual to lie. 4. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:29 am
In other words, transactional or use immunity does not permit the individual to lie. 4. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:41 pm by Paul Levy
  Actually, it was my colleague Deepak Gupta, assisted by my colleague Greg Beck, who represented the Does in this case. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:02 am by Maria Roche
” The Children’s Society, meanwhile, considers that reform is not solely an issue of resources: It will also require a change in culture that genuinely supports professional practice and does not seek to blame social workers when things go wrong” Such a cultural shift is undoubtedly out of the scope of anything that the Government can hope to swiftly implement. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:58 am by Valerie Katz
What does this have to do with small law firms? [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:02 am
This is nanny-statism run amok.FoIB Matt H sent us an interesting link that answers at least one question: Cui bono? [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Yet in the AT&T case, the majority is willing to find that California's no-class-waiver rule does not apply to "any contract" because, even though it does apply to any contract, it impedes what Justice Scalia deems to be the purpose of the FAA. [read post]