Search for: "Matter of Thomas J." Results 2721 - 2740 of 2,763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2021, 7:00 am by Rainer Winters
Their 101-page Zatarra Report states, for example, that the current CEO of Wirecard Technologies, Michael Brinkmann, incorporated two Swiss companies together with Jürg Paul Suter. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
” Slip op. 3 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (quotation partly made up). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
As a general matter, dealers are expected to act in their own interest, free to buy and sell on their own account, often on behalf of artists, collectors or galleries.[8] Agents, however, act on behalf of the person they are representing—their principal. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
The Evolution of FTC Antitrust Enforcement – Highlights of Its Origins and Major Trends 1910-1914 – Creation and Launch The election of 1912, which led to the creation of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), occurred at the apex of the Progressive Era. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 7:00 am by Rainer Winters
Their 101-page Zatarra Report states, for example, that the current CEO of Wirecard Technologies, Michael Brinkmann, incorporated two Swiss companies together with Jürg Paul Suter. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
by David Muradyan   When a creditor provides a loan to a debtor, the debtor will often grant to the creditor a security interest in the debtor’s collateral, including the debtor’s intellectual property. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:53 am by Kyle Hulehan
Why LIFO Matters Both LIFO and FIFO are grounded in the accounting principle of deducting costs when goods are sold rather than when they are acquired. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It doesn't matter what the product is (it doesn't even have to be a product). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
It is true, they are awarded to the one who has been made to suffer; but not as a matter of right. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am by Ryan Goodman
Khan QC stated that the ICC would open a third investigation against Russia for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the Russian invasion into Ukraine, which began on February 24, 2022; Whereas Ukraine has also filed a claim in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) instituting proceedings against the Russian Federation related to genocide under the Genocide Convention; and … The Senate— … (2) encourages member states to petition the ICC or other… [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
" The Amars explained that "[a]s a textual matter," the varied references to "officers of the United States" and "offices . . . under the United States" "seemingly describe[] the same stations. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
[Professors Miller and Tucker miss the mark, while Saul Cornell disdains accuracy] An article by Duke law professor Darrell A.H. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
Dale Golden told Judge Thomas Clark at the May 12, 2005, hearing in which the lawyer introduced the McKinsey slides. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Dale Golden told Judge Thomas Clark at the May 12, 2005, hearing in which the lawyer introduced the McKinsey slides. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Dale Golden told Judge Thomas Clark at the May 12, 2005, hearing in which the lawyer introduced the McKinsey slides. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm by Marty Lederman
The topic of my Law of Religion class today was what government actors should or must do when their legal and religious obligations conflict with one another. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While one might argue that the class action mechanism renders such knowledge defenses irrelevant as a matter of collateral estoppel, a class benefitting from the Basic presumption is never accurately defined merely as purchasers between dates “X and Y,” but rather should be defined as purchasers between dates “X + Y, who did not know or believe that the misrepresentation was false or that an omission occurred. [read post]