Search for: "Morris's Case" Results 2721 - 2740 of 5,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2007, 9:19 pm
(In three, the petition and/or reply was filed early (05-1126, Twombly; 05-1240, Kato; and 05-1256, Philip Morris v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Discussion As I noted at the outset, Vice Chancellor Laster’s ruling in this case represents the third recent instance in which a Delaware court has ruled that a Caremark duty of oversight case can go forward. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
In that, Mr Stephen Morris QC had made some findings on procedure that Collins J expressly ‘corrects’ in this case. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:17 pm
  The other rationale is more vital to cases involving smokers’ court cases against tobacco companies. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:30 am
Thirdly, the Court refers to the fact that New York was the seat of arbitration, and to Rule 57(2) of Dicey and Morris, which, of course, is the correct analysis but may be contrary to what the Supreme Court has held in NTPC v Singer and Bhatia International. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:39 am by Sergio Campos
 As Lyle Denniston notes, the Court will probably address the issue in Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:15 am
Young CSD v Morris, 278 AD2d 940 The significant issue in the Young Central School District case concerned determining if a grievance filed by an employee organization could be submitted to arbitration. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:57 pm by Bona Law PC
If the entertainment market or Hollywood itself interests you, there is a federal antitrust case in the Central District of California that you should follow: William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:38 am
The most prominent example would probably his position on limiting punative damages in cases like Philip Morris v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
McNeal The Case for Field Preemption of State Laws in Drug Cases  [pdf]   Richard A. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 12:56 am
The district court disagreed, reasoning as follows: First, the court concluded that adjudication of punitive damages using the class mechanism is not precluded by Philip Morris USA v. [read post]