Search for: "O’Connor Law"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 3,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am
bit.ly/xamNyE (Colin O’Keefe, Boris Segalis) “If You’re Gonna Just Read One Blog . . . [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Common law: At common law, if one asserted his or her privilege against self-incrimination (i.e. using it as a “shield”), one could not also use their claim as a “sword” to obtain information relevant to the claim. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
Alito Jr. took the place of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor the following year. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 8:16 am
His posts do not carry the force of law simply because the page says it belongs to a person who’s a public official. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:49 am
The 5-4 decision provided an odd alignment — Souter wrote the opinion, and O’Connor sided with the liberals — but the majority rejected the claim, drawing another line: as long as the police had reasonable cause to believe that the law was violated, they had the right to make an arrest. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
This bibliography comprises scholarly books, book chapters, and journal articles published or accepted for publication by full-time, emeritus, and retired faculty of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law between April 1, 2023 and June 30, 2023. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:23 am
“Cosby’s case has spurred a lot of change,” said Rebecca O’Connor, vice president for public policy at the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:43 pm
To be clear, I had O’Connor’s warning about AUMF interpretation in Hamdi in mind: “Hamdi contends that the AUMF does not authorize indefinite or perpetual detention. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
David Holahan at The Christian Science Monitor and Michiko Kakutani of The New York Times review the latest book by retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor: Out of Order: Stories from the History of the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am
There is a great deal of analysis on his old blog of great value and he continues to entertain on his new blog with: 5.15 k/o – what a FArce ‘Serial’ tweeter (in a good way), highly educated and well qualified, Dr Shibley Rahman runs the Legal Aware blog and is a keen supporter of all things blogging. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)(“well into the 20th century, [the court’s] Fourth Amendment jurisprudence was tied to common-law trespass. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:02 pm
Supreme Court Justice and merit selection advocate Sandra Day O’Connor. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
bit.ly/AFk6UU (Littler) When Can a Doctor’s Note Excuse You From Sanctions? [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
” Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices French, O’Neill, and Judge Klatt (sitting for Justice Fischer) No: Justices O’Donnell and Kennedy, and Judge Sadler (sitting for Justice DeWine) Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 2923.13 (Having weapons while under disability) (A) (Unless relieved from disability under operation of law or legal process, no person shall knowingly acquire, have,… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am
Subrogation & Recovery Law Blog Cozen & O'Connor's first LexBlog project is authored by a team of attorneys who are experts in this field. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am
Subrogation & Recovery Law Blog Cozen & O'Connor's first LexBlog project is authored by a team of attorneys who are experts in this field. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am
O’Connor v Bar Standards Board, heard 4 Oct 2017. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
But Chief Justice Roberts joined Justices Thomas and Scalia in dissent against Oregon, leaving only the Democratic appointees and the long-departed swing justices O’Connor and Kennedy in support of the kind of Commerce Clause interpretation needed for radical federal involvement in medical licensure. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 7:05 am
O’Connor v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
One of the O’Connor clerks chimed in at this point to express his agreement.Emboldened by the growing consensus, I continued that the existing military policy was unconstitutional discrimination on the merits. [read post]
