Search for: "People v. Manning"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 6:02 am
This case once again shows how qualified immunity works in police misconduct cases.The case is Williams v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 am
In this case, the Court upholds the search of a man who was arrested for possessing child pornography, involving the "good faith" exception under the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 3:00 am
"On H-Net is a review of Karine V. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:51 pm
This is such a straw man. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 10:21 am
David Simpson, a small-l libertarian Republican Texas state rep from Longview, authored an Independence Day column in his local paper opining that the US Supreme Court's recent ruling in Riley v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 9:54 am
Bracken v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
Hartung In the first part of this series posted last week, I discussed the majority and concurring opinions in Athena v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:20 pm
The case is Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:07 am
The Court of Appeals has ruled that the NAACP may proceed with a lawsuit against the State of Connecticut in claiming that the state violates the one-man-one-vote principle in counting incarcerated individuals as residing in the district where their prison is located rather than the district on which they presently reside.The case is NAACP v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:58 am
The lead case on forfeiture statutes, Bennis v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
Piper v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 7:47 am
One killed a sleeping man in his home as part of a contract killing, and the other killed a State Trooper during the commission of a burglary. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:09 am
The Virginia Supreme Court unfortunately ruled in Kiser v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
Like many people who favor censorship but have a cookie-sheet-shallow grasp of its history, Valenti is misquoting Oliver Wendell Holmes dropping a rhetorical aside in Schenck v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
Carpenter, supra.It went on to explain that the Fourth Amendment protects `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures[.] [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:17 am
But one thing that reading the Federalist does, it makes you focus on a very basic principle: No man shall be judge in his own cause. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:33 am
(Eugene Volokh) Haley v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am
” And when threats of draconian sentences compel guilty pleas, “some innocent people will plead guilty. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:09 am
For instance, in Weinberger v. [read post]
