Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 5,283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2015, 7:17 am
In Harless v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal, the issues… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
Twenty years before Brown v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 10:10 pm
People, Inc. v City of Tonawanda Zoning Board of Appeals, 2015 WL 1280303 (NYAD 4 Dept. 3/20/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_02257.htmFiled under: Current Caselaw - New York, Variances [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:07 am
This was the meaning of consigning Lochner v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:11 am
For the Appellate Division, the fact that Svenson had made a profit from the sale of the photographs does not render the use of the photographs commercial, citing the Stephano v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:34 pm
This is what distinguishes the present case from People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
As with Instagram, Twitter allows users to `share photos, in real time, with everyone or with the people [they] choose. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm
Gonzalez, 262 AD2d 281; Silver v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
Nola Spice Designs, LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm
People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:54 pm
Tobinick v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Orr v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Indeed, and ironically, amici’s proposed distinction renders the notion of “original meaning” meaningless.Interestingly, the Originalism Scholars appear to concede that Amendment 2 in Romer v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:56 am
See Minnick v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 5:53 am
In the case of Howes v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:13 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:06 am
After conferring with both sides, the Court decided to give the entire jury a specific charge on special knowledge or experience of a juror adapting a charge addressed to juror expertise, see People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Supreme Court by reading the Bartlett decision in such a way as to render it nonsensical. [read post]
