Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 3,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
It also puts into context the superiority of the French approach regarding abortion, which is proven with the reversal of Roe. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces demonstrated in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
I have written before that the Supreme Court confirmation process has become, in effect, a game. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
” Merpel had just read the latest judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court, England and Wales, in Resolution Chemicals Limited v H Lundbeck A/S [2013] EWHC 3160 (Pat). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Superior Court * The Asian Professional Exchange * Corporate counsel at Nordstrom's * Media outlets like the Daily Journal, Law Dragon, and Sister City * And high-level partners at Paul Hastings, Seyfarth Shaw, DLA Piper, Katten, and Bird & Marella Shouldn't a man trying to recapture the heart of a woman be less pathetic and bitchy? [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Superior Court, 231 P.2d 26, 28 (Cal. 1951) ("if there had been a physician patient relationship, the privilege would be waived. . . by [plaintiff's] bringing the action for personal injuries").The Weiss court determined that, since neither the state legislature nor the state courts had seen fit to create a physician/patient privilege, it was not the job of a federal court, sitting in diversity, to change state law. 2007 WL 2137782, at *2… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
Supreme Court held in Twombly v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:04 pm
As the Court held in Ybarra v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm
Just two months before Al-Kidd, on March 29, 2011, the Supreme Court ruled in Connick v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:57 pm
Are the higher pleasures infinitely superior and always trump any quantity of lower? [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:38 am
Justice Scalia, though typically exaggerating the negative consequences of comments with which he disagreed, was probably close to correct in suggesting that lower court judges and litigating lawyers will focus on the privacy discussion the Court allowed itself to make, rather than the specific legal outcome, in City of Ontario, et al., v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
First, Gitlow v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 11:35 am
(People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 11:51 am
As a peacemaker, the lawyer has a superior opportunity of being a good man. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
More to the point, as the Supreme Court clarified in KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
Supreme Court has held in a widely respected opinion, NCAA v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
Supreme Court has held in a widely respected opinion, NCAA v. [read post]
