Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm
Although the California Supreme Court noted that its decision in People ex rel. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 4:19 pm
Marlo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:57 pm
Kurkov has been charged in King County Superior Court and has 20 days to respond to the charges. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:38 am
Superior Court, 159 Cal. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
Over the weekend I wrote about Lodi v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 am
People didn't always feel that way--the current view basically developed during the Court-packing crisis of 1937. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Mattel argued that the list of examples in the contract were illustrative not exclusive, but the Court held that "ideas" are "markedly different from the list of examples including discoveries, improvements and designs" (People ex rel Lungren v superior Court (1996)). [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
As I become aware of people doing these things, I confront them and shut them down. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 3:26 pm
Lodi v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
Heymann: This is tied to TM as source indicator v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:10 am
The bill was a knee jerk reaction by the legislature who were unhappy with a number of more recent court decisions liberally allowing for palimony claims including the ruling in Devaney v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:45 am
The Court distinguished this situation from a prior case, Nazir v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:43 am
In the case of Kamboj v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:49 am
This is worth noting as it seems to flow from the Supreme Court's ruling in Chaoulli v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:15 am
, Isaacs v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:39 pm
F.T. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:53 am
Some people lately like to talk about how government employees are overpaid (at least when pensions and benefits are taken into account) and allegedly have "cushy" jobs.But without taking a position on that debate, do you know any other job where your employer is permitted to breach (1) his contract with you, and (2) an express a collective bargaining agreement, and not pay you (as well as thousands of other employees like you) despite these employment promises? [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Judge Ward affirms $482,000,000 damages award, but overturns willfulness finding: Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:51 am
The argument in Marbury v. [read post]
