Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 2,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2008, 10:47 am
Co., 48 AD3d 397, 398; Metropolitan Heat & Power Co., Inc. v AIG Claims Servs., Inc., 47 AD3d 621, 623; Trapani v 10 Arial Way Assoc., 301 AD2d 644, 647; Penske Truck Leasing Co. v Home Ins. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 5:55 pm
While voters have rejected public financing of stadiums in San Jose, Milwaukee, and Seattle in ballot initiatives, those teams were still able to obtain new stadiums. [31] V. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 5:21 am
* The Power of Internet Gripe Sites: Managing the Destructive Potential of "BrandSucks.com. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
Davis (2001) and Clark v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 12:47 pm
The consensus policy of economists would put most of the burden of adjustment on politically powerful holders of equity and bonds. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:52 am
In Tuesday's post, I explained why I thought Quanta v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:15 pm
The recent case of Mission Shores Association v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
Respondents relied on Rust v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 11:38 am
Richlin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 11:09 am
For copyright holders, this would remove some of the power of the takedown notice, as it wouldn't require the service provider to react, like a DMCA notice does. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
” Johnson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 6:58 pm
That has now changed thanks to the Delaware Supreme Court's recent opinion in Wood v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 11:18 am
A few days ago, the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) passed its order in the Reliance Power IPO Case. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:00 am
In Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:37 pm
Document shredding and claims of being authorised to take mortgage holders money (Eh?) [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
The Fifth Circuit in Saddler v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:09 pm
On June 9, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:45 am
See Keeler v. [read post]