Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE" Results 2721 - 2740 of 3,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
Cases that may be of interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:18 am
   The LawArticle 6 of the InfoSoc Directive states: Obligations as to technological measures1. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In support of this opposition, eBay cites Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506 F3d 1165 (9th Cir., Nove. 5, 2007) where the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the term "BAY" was the dominant portion of the eBay mark. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Shana Tabak
Lee, General Counsel, Export-Import Bank of the United States Elizabeth R. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:24 pm
State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519, 1983-1 Trade Cases ¶65,226, to deny Static Control’s standing to pursue state law unfair competition claims.The decision is Static Control Components, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:50 am
We commend the Pennsylvania approach to other states. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 5:53 pm by Bill Marler
One that we all have had first-hand experience from the now infamous Kreifall v. [read post]