Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 2721 - 2740 of 6,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2019, 4:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We also agree with the court’s determination to deny that branch of the moving defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing this cause of action insofar as asserted against Botter, because they failed to adduce evidence establishing, prima facie, that he did not directly supervise Anthony (see Partnership Law § 26[c]). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Probably Not As Much As You Think – Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Shipman & Goodwin in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Proof of Specific Licenses Required to Rebut Successful First Sale Defense – Seattle intellectual property lawyer Tonya Gisselberg on her blog, Seattle Copyright Watch Drinking Milkshakes v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 5:11 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds K is for Strike Price L is for Late Filing & Late Payment Penalties M is for Marginal Tax Rate N is for NSF O is for Over-The-Counter Medications P is for Pease Limitations Q is for Quid Pro… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:28 am by Rhead Enion
  Food Lion specifically rejected Food Lion’s claim for compensatory damages, such as loss of good will and lost sales from ABC’s investigative report. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 6:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As held in the case of Petrossian v Grossman, the burden of proving entitlement to disqualifying opposing counsel rests on the movant. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As held in the case of Petrossian v Grossman, the burden of proving entitlement to disqualifying opposing counsel rests on the movant. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:13 am by war
QS Holdings Sarl v Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1038   [read post]