Search for: "Samsung" Results 2721 - 2740 of 6,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 4:50 pm by Joe Mullin
Within a few days, Reines showed the email to in-house counsel at many of his big-ticket tech clients, including Apple, Cisco, eBay, Facebook, HP, Netapp, Newegg, Samsung, and Yahoo. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:05 am by Dennis Crouch
 Here are a couple of lists of organizations with the most Patently-O email subscribers: Law Firms: Fish & Richardson Morrison Foerster WilmerHale Harness Dickey Finnegan KLGates Foley Lardner McDermott Will & Emery Cooley JonesDay Kirkland Ellis Knobbe Martens Alston Bird RopesGray Non Law Firm: USPTO GE Qualcomm Samsung Novartis Pfizer Microsoft HP LGE Dow Intellectual Ventures Dr. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:03 pm by Sean Hayes
Bloomberg Business Week published earlier this year a great article on the power of Samsung in the Korean market. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:28 pm by Florian Mueller
Samsung's key counterclaim is now a request for a judicial "declaration that Samsung may terminate the [business collaboration agreement] and [patent license agreement] pursuant to BCA Sections 9.7 and 8.5. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
      Related Stories"The Decade of Discovery" On Tour - eDiscovery TrendsDespite 18 Missing Emails in Production, Court Denies Request for “Discovery on Discovery” - eDiscovery Case LawApple Recovers Part, But Not All, of its Requested eDiscovery Costs from Samsung - eDiscovery Case Law  [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:07 am by Lindsay Stafford Mader
Many businesses, particularly large tech companies like Facebook and Samsung, put considerable resources into designing office layouts and choosing tools and gadgets. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
      Related StoriesText Overlays on Image-Only PDF Files Can Be Problematic - eDiscovery Best PracticesBattle Continues between Attorneys and Client over Attorneys’ Failure to Review Documents - eDiscovery Case LawApple Recovers Part, But Not All, of its Requested eDiscovery Costs from Samsung - eDiscovery Case Law  [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
      Related StoriesApple Recovers Part, But Not All, of its Requested eDiscovery Costs from Samsung - eDiscovery Case LawThose Pesky Email Signatures and Disclaimers - eDiscovery Best PracticesText Overlays on Image-Only PDF Files Can Be Problematic - eDiscovery Best Practices  [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Apple won several battles with Samsung, including ultimately being awarded over $1 billion in verdicts, as well as a $2 million sanction for the inadvertent disclosure of its outside counsel firm (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP) commonly known as “patentgate”, but ultimately may have lost the war when the court refused to ban Samsung from selling products that were found to have infringed on Apple products. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 11:05 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
" For example, someone searching for [ iPhone ] may simply be interested in a smartphone, and may end up discovering and preferring a Samsung phone. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Florian Mueller
After Google's recent--and expected (this blog was first to report that it was coming)--petition to the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari (i.e., for a review of the Federal Circuit's decision in Oracle's favor, see my refresher Q&A after the appellate decision), I have seen a couple of articles that described the state of affairs and quoted observers on what all of this meant. [read post]