Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 2721 - 2740 of 5,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2013, 8:32 am by harry
McNeely, No. 11-1425, it is even more important now for an individual to exercise his 4th Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure and refuse to submit to such requested blood testing. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:32 am by admin
McNeely, No. 11-1425, it is even more important now for an individual to exercise his 4th Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure and refuse to submit to such requested blood testing. [read post]
22 May 2013, 1:21 pm by Jay Stanley
As Rebecca Robertson, legal and policy director for the ACLU of Texas put it, “By approving this amendment, our legislators would take a significant step to preserve the Fourth Amendment rights of Texas citizens, protecting them from potential unreasonable searches and seizures that could take place entirely outside judicial review. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:48 am
The Fourth Amendment says that there shall not be any search unless based on probable cause and after a judge has issued a warrant. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:11 pm
Both a Missouri lower court and the Missouri State Supreme Court tossed the blood test results, because they said they violated McNeely’s Constitutional rights against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:53 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
As we see it, no more than this is required where the warrant requested is for the seizure of criminal evidence reasonably believed to be on the premises occupied by a newspaper. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  Though the word “seizures” appears in the same phrase in the Fourth Amendment as the word “searches,” the Court has been more generous in permitting police to skip the warrant in the case of seizures than it has in the case of searches. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:22 am by Michael DelSignore
Warrantless search of vehicle raises 4th amendment issues regarding the automobile exception to the search and seizure clause [read post]
13 May 2013, 12:56 pm by Dawn Livingston
 Some have claimed the bill flies in the face of constitutional protections against search and seizure and creates an avenue for the government to receive personal information without a warrant. [read post]
13 May 2013, 12:56 pm by Dawn Livingston
 Some have claimed the bill flies in the face of constitutional protections against search and seizure and creates an avenue for the government to receive personal information without a warrant. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:35 am
For example, did the search which resulted in the seizure of the contraband exceed what was allowed by the warrant? [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:33 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Why the FBI thinks it needs no search warrant to read your old emailFrom the International Business Times. [read post]
10 May 2013, 9:31 pm
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
8 May 2013, 10:48 am
The state argued that there was an exception to the general rule that the police need a search warrant for a search and seizure. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:56 pm
However, one does not necessarily have to submit to search and seizure of ones’ person or property unless the police have a warrant. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm by CAPTAIN
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 11:10 pm by The Charge
  The Fourth Amendment and Art. 14 apply to unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 2:39 pm
The United States Constitution, along with the Florida Constitution, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
”  In re Warrant, supra.)The judge also explains that, in order to accomplish all this, the Government has applied for a Rule 41 search and seizure warrant targeting a computer allegedly used to violate federal bank fraud, identity theft, and computer security laws. [read post]