Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2013, 5:00 am
(filed 04/08/13) Amici Curiae Brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Benson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
The merits briefing in Rose v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 7:45 am
In Perry v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 12:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:10 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 pm
[President Biden invokes Section 212(f) of the INA to block asylum seekers from entering the United States.] [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:02 am
Chevron Corp. and Doe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 5:20 pm
The petition of the day is: United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 3:28 pm
A recent California Court of Appeal decision upheld the state’s complex rules for compensating piece-rate employees. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
The DOMA (Section 3) case before the high court was United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Ford Motor Company – United States District Court – Northern District of California – November 25th, 2015 – This case involves an alleged design defect in the backlight on the rear liftgate of certain automobiles. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
Feb 26, 2007) (available for download below): The sky is not completely falling in California after Cunningham v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:06 pm
OppFi’s complaint recites that prior to 2019, the Bank entered into a contractual arrangement with OppFi (Program) pursuant to which the Bank uses OppFi’s technology platform to make small-dollar loans to consumers throughout the United States (Program Loans). [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Candidate at Princeton University analyzed the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hertz v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and will hear the case in the upcoming term. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a "tangible object" (United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 4:11 pm
Sources: United States Patent and Trademark Office United States Patent and Trademark Office-Trademarks Home California Secretary of State-Trademarks and Service Marks Model State Trademark Law/CA. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
United States, 12-6355, concerning the proper application of the categorical analysis in Shepard v. [read post]
