Search for: "State of New York et al" Results 2721 - 2740 of 3,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 3:50 am
Issuing an unambiguous final decision indicating that all administrative appeals have been exhausted triggers the running of the statute of limitationsMatter of Janet Arnold, et al v Erie County Med. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:00 pm
Justice Department Opposes New Google Book SettlementThis posting was written by Darius Sturmer, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.Despite the substantial progress reflected in the proposed amended settlement agreement in The Authors Guild Inc. et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Boston Scientific (Docket Report)(271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Allegation that plaintiff ‘buried’ prior art in IDS is sufficient to state of claim for inequitable conduct: CIVIX-DDI LLC v National Association of Realtors et al (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Attorney delinquence excuses 7 year delay in reviving expired patent: SprinGuard Technology Group Inc. v USPTO (271 Patent Blog) District Court Wyoming: Filing a patent on… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:57 am
Lawsuit dismissed for failure to specify the acts or omissions of unlawful discrimination underlying the complaintRoth v State University of New York, et. al., 61 AD3d 476Jeffrey Roth sued SUNY’s State College of Optometry and named individuals, alleging he was the victim of unlawful discrimination. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 5:51 am by Penn Program on Regulation
 In their study of pulp and paper mills, for example, Gunningham et al. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:21 am
Arbitration pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement held exclusive remedy for alleged discrimination14 Penn Plaza LLC et al. v Pyett et al., United States Supreme Court, 129 S. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:21 am by Bob Kraft
" The Wall Street Journal (2/2, Linebaugh et al.) reports Toyota said it's confident the repair and another one involving floor mats, will end the speed-control problem. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
  The Queen of England continues to be our official figure-head of state. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US General iSlate, iTablet, IP! [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:38 pm by Jim Pravel
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) found the District Court for the Southern District of New York erred in its claim construction of critical claim terms in Shindler Elevator Corp. et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims (without cancelling the broader… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's et. al., No. 08-10451 (5th Cir. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
LEDdynamics (PATracer) Eastman Chemical Company - Licensor, sue thy own, for thy secrets – licensor sues licensee for patent infringement and trade secret breach: Eastman Chemical Company v AlphaPet Inc, et al (Patent Baristas) Hexagon - ALJ Bullock grants joint motion by Hexagon and Nikon Metrology and Metris to terminate the investigation in certain articulated coordinate measuring arms (337-TA-684) (ITC Law Blog) Sharp Corporation of Japan - Sharp files new 337… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:06 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Co. et al (Southern District of New York, January 7, 2010)    Stonewall Corporation commenced a third-party action against its former attorney alleging he committed legal malpractice while providing it representation with respect to property rights in New Jersey. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Like this op-ed in today's New York Times about the Supreme Court's refusal to hear Rasul v. [read post]