Search for: "State v. Character" Results 2721 - 2740 of 7,505
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am by Jack Sharman
When the IRS happens upon the money trail, and a top prosecutor leans on him to turn state’s evidence and finger some of the corrupt justices, Robbie calls on George Mason, veteran Kindle County lawyer, to represent him and win the best deal he can. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:40 pm by Patricia Salkin
SBA Towers V, LLC v City of Madison Board of Zoning Appeals, 2017 WL 1927735 (SD IN 5/9/2017)Filed under: Wireless Communications [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:12 am by Joy Waltemath
” Where the complaint in an action for declaratory judgment seeks in essence to assert a defense to an impending or threatened state court action, it is the character of the threatened action which will determine whether there is a federal question jurisdiction in the district court. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by John Floyd
  In a May 30, 2017 decision, Ledezma-Cosino v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm by Bill Otis
 See Justice Scalia's lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am by Jonathan Metzer
Image: Flickr.com   R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42 In a nutshell The Government’s flagship scheme to deport foreign criminals first and hear their appeals later was ruled by the Supreme Court to be incompatible with the appellants’ right to respect for their private and family life (reversing the decision below). [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:03 pm by Patricia Salkin
Beekman Delamater Properties, LLC v Village of Rhinebeck Zoning Board of Appeals, 2017 WL 2260271 (NYAD 2 Dept. 5/24/2017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Site Plan Review, Special Use/Exception, Uncategorized [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 am by Danny Y. Yoo
The reasoning behind this exemption is that recreational establishments have a “particular character” that may require longer hours in a shorter season. [read post]