Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 29,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Title: Strickland v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
The subject has been much on my mind in the last two or three days while reading and commenting on Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:00 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
The Congress, and the several states, have power to enforce this Article by appropriate legislation; [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 5:31 am
Here is the petition in County of Amador v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
If Congress did not mean to refer to state-established exchanges, why did it use the phrase “established by the State”? [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm
(Defamation; Nuisance: Counterclaims) United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:14 pm
Department of the Interior (Allotments; Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html State of Alaska v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 10:46 am
Congress will not let the Big 3 credit agencies work around the FCRA using Section 230. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:40 am
Lower courts have disagreed as to whether state reports and audits were intended by Congress to raise that bar.The underlying lawsuit alleged fraud by a water conservation district in the use of federal disaster assistance.The case is Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 10:24 am
The 9th Circuit issued its long awaited opinion in Gordon v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:32 pm
Happersett (U.S. 1875), the decision of Congress to admit a state to the Union is conclusive proof that, at the time, the state had a Republican Form of Government. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 9:11 am
There is no serious debate that the First Amendment permits Congress to adopt speech-enhancing statutes, including Section 230. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:59 am
"Professor Klarman then responded with several arguments, one of the most persuasive of which was that the United States Congress controlled the D.C. school system and chose not to desegregate the system. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:45 am
[Editor’s note: An earlier version of this post ran on February 5, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:09 pm
[Moore v. [read post]
