Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 2721 - 2740
of 6,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2020, 12:39 pm
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 10th and 11th Circuits, Davis v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:46 am
White v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
High Court agreed with Davis and Watson in July 2015. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:22 am
<> UC Davis and Honda Unveil Smart Home For a Zero-Carbon Future - Honda and the University of California, Davis aren't particularly known for constructing homes, but an ambitious project places the two entities at the forefront of designing homes capable of producing more renewable energy. . . [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:43 pm
Code, §§ 1001-1001.9, 1001.50-1001.55; Davis v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:19 am
The court in Simon v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:00 am
" See State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:57 am
In Davis v Monroe County Board of Education, 526 US 629, the Supreme Court held that a school board may be liable for the failure to stop students from sexually harassing other students if school officials are deliberately indifferent to the harassment. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:39 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:56 am
Davis v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
” At National Law Review, Donald Davis looks at the court’s decision last week in Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
The new case, Davis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:28 pm
Co., 36 AD2d 445, affd 30 NY2d 546; Davis v De Frank, 33 AD2d 236, 241, affd 27 NY2d 924). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:44 am
Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962) (quoting Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 12:46 am
Davis v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:36 am
CHARLES DAVIS, Appellant, v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:04 am
Co., 13 N.Y. 31 [1855]), and a few decades later the United States Supreme Court rejected it also (Grigsby v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm
Although noting that states do have a margin of appreciation in this regard, it was also made clear, citing Perna v. [read post]
