Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 9,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2010, 11:13 am
Doctors had to partially amputate her fingers. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:55 am
In Coast Plaza Doctors Hosp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 10:02 am
Both doctors stated that they did not feel that Mr. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Thus, as Jacob LJ explained in Actavis v Merck at [75], such a claim "is not aimed at and does not touch the doctor - it is directed at the manufacturer. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:20 am
More significantly, residency programs, while providing important medical services to patients, understand that they are primarily training programs (economic pressures may well be changing this, but that is the stated objective), part of the apprenticeship process. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
Intermountain Stroke Center, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 12:51 pm
The same conclusions divorced of human experience (and fundamental mathematics) in Kemper v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 12:51 pm
The same conclusions divorced of human experience (and fundamental mathematics) in Kemper v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Morgan State University (06-306) and turned aside a petition for rehearing in the denied case of Ray v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:22 am
State ex rel. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:01 am
It is a Houston Court of Appeals [14th Dist.] case styled, Allstate v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
Thus, Dr Mattu’s position, as a registered consultant, was distinguished from the position of the trainee doctor in Kulkarni v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Trust [2009] ICR 101, who could not complete his training in the private sector and whose dismissal would (in the obiter view of Smith LJ) have engaged Article 6 and its safeguards. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:42 am
App. 2002); and Valtex, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
That's why cases like South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 9:14 am
The tentative opinion of the Fourth District Court of Appeals in the case of the City of Riverside v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 6:25 pm
" Berger v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:34 am
Mensing and Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:58 am
Newman v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:07 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
