Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 5,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
Perhaps there has been some misunderstanding here, so I shall set out my thoughts from the beginning.As I stated above, the usual situation is that a product-by-process claim “X obtained/able by process Y” represents a novel subset of generic X. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
These allegations, at least, bear the indicia of negligence. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
And here’s one application of the law, from Thomas v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 8:35 am
A pending Supreme Court, Elonis v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
`Can I at least hope you're getting some good material for another book? [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
* EPO video-conferencing: good for the planet -- but is it good for patent applicants too? [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:15 pm
We are skeptical that Heckler v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
As Justice Kennedy put it in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 am
State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Warger v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
This reminds me of a favorite phrase of mine “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
While the "essential function" of the trade mark in Europe is "to guarantee the identity of origin of the marked goods or services to the consumer or end user by enabling him, without any possibility of confusion, to distinguish the goods or services from others which have another origin" (Case C-206/01 Arsenal v Reed)the protection is given not to the consumer but to the trade mark owner as guarantor of the identity of the origin of the marked… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
” Sorrell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The case that deals with what the custodial parent has to show the court to be able to move from New Jersey with the children is Baures v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The case that deals with what the custodial parent has to show the court to be able to move from New Jersey with the children is Baures v. [read post]
