Search for: "State v. L. A. T." Results 2721 - 2740 of 9,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
"(Click on photo for larger version)Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, John Cannan explains why, although “[l]egislative history is often not a foolproof method of divining legislative intent, … it provides significant clarity” in the case of Azar v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
In its statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant maintained the main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5 considered in the contested decision and resubmitted those requests as main request and auxiliary requests I to V. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
There are very limited exceptions which won’t apply in most cases). [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:16 pm
The Court referred to its ruling in Now Pharm v Commission, T‑74/08, where it held  that the orphan drug in question is to be compared with all medicinal products that have been authorized in the EU (without  exception), and that both  Articles 5(12) and 7(3) of the Regulation provide as the deadline for the examination of the designation criteria (i.e.,  the date  on  which the Commission is to determine whether the OD fulfills the… [read post]