Search for: "State v. Primes" Results 2721 - 2740 of 2,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
The complaint cites Justice Story's dicta in Lowell v Lewis (1817) which stated that inventions that are "injurious to the well being, good policy, or sound morals of society" are unpatentable. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
As the latest draft states, "[w]e are now in the final stages of this project. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cotter, Nominal Damages—and Nominal Damages Workarounds—in Intellectual Property Law TransUnion v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
Medicare and Medicaid are the two prime examples of Federal health care programs that pays for services, goods, and facilities. [read post]
In this regard, the Interim Report recommends that the WFL prohibit workplace discrimination in respect of the following characteristics: (i) age, (ii) nationality, (iii) sex, marital status, pregnancy status, caregiving responsibilities, (iv) race, religion, language, (v) disability and mental health conditions (the “Protected Characteristics”). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm by Steven Boutwell
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm by Ailyn Cabico
  These advisers should submit a state Form ADV to the relevant state by March 20, 2012 to allow at least 90 days for state approval (California in particular). (2) State-registered Investment Adviser switching to SEC registration. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
In 2010, this data was considered to decide who had a realistic prospect of becoming the Prime Minister. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court on December 7 agreed to review the constitutionality of Section 3 in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:27 pm by Glenn
Even before the landmark United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
While the Court supports its ruling with over 50 pages of factual findings, its holding was essentially a foregone conclusion once the Court determined that it agreed with the reasoning of VFB LLC v. [read post]