Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 57,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
There are a number of ancient common law writs that have been preserved in New York State's Civil Practice Law and Rules. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
There are a number of ancient common law writs that have been preserved in New York State's Civil Practice Law and Rules. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:00 pm
I’m worried about the future of Roe v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 4:12 am
Civil Service Commission’s jurisdictional reclassification of 29 titles to the noncompetitive class violated Article V, §6’s merit and fitness mandateMatter of Brynien v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:24 am
Third, she argued she should not have to reimburse Pinto for enforcing the Mexican custody order since she claimed her Mexican lawyer said she could take the children to the United States without violating that order. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 3:45 am
Extremely interesting case from the 11th Circuit today, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm
It was a tale of two arguments yesterday in Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
But given what the Supreme Court has said from Osborn -- 190 years ago -- to Red Cross (22 years ago), Judge Fletcher's correct. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:17 pm
Yet Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
Back in 1994, in State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:39 pm
R. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:15 am
Cuomo, (ED NY, Feb. 9, 2021) said in part:In light of the decisions by the Supreme Court, Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, N.Y. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
The government said that the MOU bosters both its position and the D.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
(Justices Ginsberg and Stevens, neither of whom, I might add, remain either on the Court or breathing).Given that the Supreme Court has indisputably said that primaries have to be closed if that's what the party wants, the plaintiff's argument here that it's unconstitutional for a state to allow primaries to be closed is a surefire loser. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:31 am
Donald Yeaples and Deborah Yeaples v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:18 pm
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Compulife Software, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:07 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:55 am
State, where the Supreme Court essentially said all is okay with the way we go about selecting and hearing court of appeals cases (Eugster argued constitutional violation of free and equal elections). [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 1:42 pm
Which brings us to the strange case of United States v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:30 pm
The answer is an unqualified yes.In 1982, the Supreme Court decidedPlyler v. [read post]
