Search for: "State v. White" Results 2721 - 2740 of 11,804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 8:03 am by Prof. Brian Kalt, guest-blogging
He too takes an oath of office as acting president and, without using force, he assumes physical control of the White House. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
According to the logic of The Reasoning State, whatever flaw exists in West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by INFORRM
But in the early hours of December 25, 2013, unknown protestors in the town of Blagoevgrad had gone to the square in the town centre and daubed red and white paint over a statue of Dimitar Blagoev, making it resemble Father Christmas. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 3:01 pm by Barry Herman
On December 29, 2009, Nokia Corporation of Finland and Nokia Inc. of White Plains, New York (collectively, “Nokia”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
McHugh is a "friend of white supremacists" is true, but nothing in her questions to me gave me any reason to believe she is a racist. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Judge Nardini writes, "The problem with Murray’s claim is that, as the Supreme Court held  in  Rivera  v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:36 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> NRDC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has ruled that the NAACP may proceed with a lawsuit against the State of Connecticut in claiming that the state violates the one-man-one-vote principle in counting incarcerated individuals as residing in the district where their prison is located rather than the district on which they presently reside.The case is NAACP v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
California’s affirmative action ban, added to the state constitution when voters passed Proposition 209 in November 1996, did not violate the US Constitution, the Ninth Circuit held on Monday (Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Brown, April 2, 2012). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am by Richard Mumford
Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin) – Read judgment On 13 October 2011 Mr Justice Supperstone in the High Court held that changes to rules for calculating housing benefit were lawful and in particular did not breach equality legislation. [read post]