Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
https://t.co/YcW02iVSzm -> New anti-spam law won’t put a stop to all unwanted emails, says legal expert https://t.co/9tOhKDAYEK -> CASL: the unofficial FAQ, regulatory impact statement, and compliance guideline: The “anti-spam” portion of Ca… http://t.co/3t7sfEda02 -> Don’t hit “Send”: Sweeping anti-spam law goes into effect in Canada http://t.co/nBkUgO8ozY -> Google Glass banned from UK cinemas over copyright and privacy… [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
How do we know that the gov’t when setting the boundaries of the property right isn’t screwing it up? [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:11 am
Helde v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:03 am
CASL should not compromise or impair, but should promote, the protection of privacy and the security of confidential information. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:54 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:08 am
Don't forget to check the IPKat's Forthcoming Events page, here: there are always new seminars, lectures and conferences ahead, sometimes free and often with special price reductions for IPKat readers. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
For example, courts have not permitted tacking between the following marks: AMERICAN MOBILPHONE and AMERICAN MOBILPHONE PAGING; SHAPE UP and SHAPE; HOME PROTECTION HARDWARE and HOME PROTECTION CENTER; and PRO-KUT and PRO-CUTS. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
” In that case, U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
The writing, she felt, was on the wall about how this saga would ultimately play out and it wouldn't play well for copyright law or litigation. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:04 am
Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion, the employer renewed its motion to compel arbitration. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See Harris Interactive, 2013 Mobile Consumer Habits Study (June 2013). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:39 am
Four years later, the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:18 am
Greater protection for life insurance proceeds payable to trusts: In 2012 I wrote here about the Morey v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
Under common law a mark is protectable through its use, or as was stated by Justice Pitney in United Drug Co v Theodore Rectans Co: "...the right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption; its function is simply to designate the goods as the product of a particular trader and to protect his good will against the sale of another's product as his". [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:02 pm
Hearn, attorney from the Consumer Protection Branch of the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
However, Pennsylvania’s consumer protection statute is quirky, and does not provide for a jury trial. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
Basically, copyright isn't keeping up with the digital environment, there are some stakeholders who have more power than others over/under the copyright system, and those more powerful stakeholders shouldn't be allowed to ride rough-shod over creatives who want to engage with digital technologies by using a regime that isn't able to self-regulate in response to these new circumstances in which copyright needs to operate": Keigh-Lee Paroz. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
KIND LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Sterk v. [read post]
