Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 11,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 1:39 pm
Tonkovic, J.D.A plaintiff was not tilting at windmills when he asked a district court to remand an action to the state court. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 4:56 am
State of California (2023) 98 Cal. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 10:46 am
Occasionally, and in the interest of judicial economy and efficiency, an attorney may be appointed out of order when there is a related pending appeal for the same defendant.PREREQUISITES: Attorneys interested in an appointment to represent indigent defendants are required to: • Be a member in good standing of the California State Bar; • Possess strong research and writing skills; • Have an understanding of criminal law and procedure; • Be familiar… [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 4:35 am
District Court Judge Lucy Koh of the United States Federal District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 11:26 am
The Court may well look to the California Supreme Court’s Brinker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
Moore -- who served as a combat nurse in Vietnam -- has written "Justice for Veterans" for the latest edition of the State Bar's California Litigation magazine. [read post]
29 May 2016, 1:14 pm
The case stems from a real estate foreclosure, which prompted a lawsuit against (among others) Fannie Mae in California state court. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 2:51 pm
On appeal, the California Court of Appeal stated that as a general rule, people have a duty to avoid injuring others and can be held liable when their conduct does cause harm to others. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:27 am
Turtle (Lacey Act; Endangered Species)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlInterest of D.E.D.I (Indian Child Welfare Act - Expert Witnesses)Tribal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2019.htmlCorporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:27 am
Turtle (Lacey Act; Endangered Species)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlInterest of D.E.D.I (Indian Child Welfare Act - Expert Witnesses)Tribal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2019.htmlCorporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:40 pm
Proposition 12 bars the sale in California of uncooked pork products when the seller knows or should know that the meat came from the offspring of a sow – a breeding pig – that was confined “in a cruel manner. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm
* More fallout from the California Bar Exam results. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
For their part, law enforcement leaders in Iowa have reacted cautiously to the announcement, implying the digital license may cause more problems for police departments than it solves.All of this brings to mind the recent SCOTUS decision in Riley v California, where the High Court ruled that in order for police to access the information on a motorists' cell phone, a warrant is required. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:38 am
" [CNBC] * According to the American Bar Association, there's not much that can be done for students at Western State University College of Law. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:10 am
[Newsweek] * California's bar exam is driving the state bar into the red and the entity shrugged off a plan to fix it. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
Ayala filed a demurrer to the petition arguing that it failed to state a cause of action. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:17 am
The Fresno County Superior Court earlier this month upheld the California law allowing licensed marijuana delivery companies to offer services anywhere in the state. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Simply stated: “[a] collateral attack is not a substitute for an appeal” reasoned the Second Appellate District Court in Bowman v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:00 am
Laura Ernde writes: Consumer class-action lawsuits are alive and well in California after a 4-3 decision Monday from the state Supreme Court that limited the reach of a 2005 voter initiative targeting frivolous lawsuits. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:41 am
The Court found in Riegel that claims are barred under a preemption clause included in the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (MDA). [read post]
