Search for: "US v. George" Results 2721 - 2740 of 6,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am by Ashoka Mukpo
Allison Shelley for the ACLUIn the days following George Floyd’s murder, President Trump had focused his attention on the relatively small number of people who had damaged property, threatening to use the “unlimited power of our military” and tweeting “when the looting starts, the shooting starts. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket offers analyses of several recent Supreme Court decisions: arbitration case Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Andrew Michaels discusses SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:26 am by Edith Roberts
’” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Roger Schechter remarks that it is “curious … how little attention any of the Justices paid to the unique features of trademark law” in Iancu v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
My prior posts on the Koch-v-Cato kerfuffle are here and here. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Ambler Realty Co.; and (2) whether a regulatory restriction on the right to use one's property “must substantially advance a legitimate state interest” to satisfy the substantive requirement of due process, per Lingle, Nectow, and Euclid. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am by Peter Margulies
  (See George Brown’s analysis here.) [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
”The response from my insurrectionist reader was that people like me should not assume that the US armed forces will fight against the insurrectionists. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:42 am
Lew, 68 Cal.2d 774, 778 [69 Cal.Rptr. 102] (1968); In re George G., 68 Cal.App.3d 146, 155 [137 Cal.Rptr. 201] (1977); People v. [read post]