Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 5:59 am
The Court summarizes the facts as follows: The petitioner was admitted into the United States in 1984 as a lawful permanent resident. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
In 1420041 Ontario Inc. v. 1 King West Inc., the Court of Appeal for Ontario has recently answered Yes to this question, provided that the relief is directly related to the unit owner’s enjoyment of his or her unit. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 7:12 pm
For the H-4 or O-3 visa holder, here accompanying a spouse who is lawfully employed in the US, such a person is likely to be physically present in the United States for all or most of the year, rather than under 3 months. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm
Many have since surfaced at crime scenes in Mexico and the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court's June 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:38 pm
A recent unpublished decision issued by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on May 21, 2012, in Kiefer v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm
United States, 247 U.S. 7 (1918), where the Supreme Court held that when a custodian of records, who is not the privilege holder, is ordered to produce supposedly privileged documents, the privilege holder may directly appeal the order if the holder cannot otherwise disobey the order. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court finally issued its long-awaited ruling in Eaton v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 9:34 am
First, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Reproduced with permission from Electronic Commerce & Law Report, (June 13, 2012). [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:25 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
In contrast to the United States, treble (or multiple) damages are not available. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
” California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:05 pm
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
You’ve Been Served Angellino v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
You’ve Been Served Angellino v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the definition provided by R 26(4), “plant variety” means any plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank, which grouping, irrespective of whether the conditions for the grant of a plant variety right are fully met, can be (a) defined by the expression of the characteristics that results from a given genotype or combination of genotypes, (b) distinguished from any other plant grouping by the expression of at least one of the said characteristics,… [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
Nor did the EEOC’s April ruling in Macy v Holder create a new protected class of transgender people, Feldblum said. [read post]
