Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 2721 - 2740 of 32,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States will decide ICWA’s constitutionality in Haaland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm by Levin Papantonio
Levin Papantonio Rafferty (LPR) attorneys fighting to hold social media companies accountable for recommending harmful content or supporting acts of international terrorism by hosting terrorist content filed amici curiae (friends of the court) briefs with the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:13 am by Emma Snell
Despite widespread fears in the tech community about such a blow, the justices’ arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:01 am by DONALD SCARINCI
As a result, Groff informed his employer, the United States Postal Service (USPS), that he was unable to work on Sundays. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:33 am by Howard Bashman
United States, No. 22–5364, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a dissent, in which Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined, from the denial of certiorari. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:15 am by Ilya Somin
It also claims that virtually everyone in the United States qualifies under (C), because, in March 2020, then-President Trump declared the entire country a “disaster area” because of COVID. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
By John Culhane The United States Supreme Court poses a serious threat to public health, but not because the majority of the justices are necessarily opposed to laws and policies designed to protect and further public health and safety. [read post]
In both Gonzalez and Taamneh, the Solicitor General will also be arguing on behalf of the United States. [read post]