Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 6,421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Rosenberg v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:17 pm
It is a known feat of the Mexican Government to redraw borders and extract the wealth from the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 5:01 am
After reading the opinion in a recent Tax Court case, Najafpir v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
The Court stated that “minor perceived inconsistencies and omissions may be insufficient to support an adverse-credibility finding. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:29 am
The worst offender in this regard is American political science, both in the sense of the sub-field that studies the United States and the scholarship and institutions (i.e. political science departments, associations, journals) of the country. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
See State of Florida v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
United States Postal Service. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:57 am
United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607–08 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:22 pm
See also … United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 8:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:50 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:18 am
De Simone v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:06 am
Statutory Background Under the INA, lawful permanent residents of the United States are not citizens of the United States, but they hold “green cards” and enjoy the right to live and work in the United States with little restraint compared to other lawful immigration categories. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
(See Fairbank v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:30 am
United States, the case that upheld the Japanese internment, is more an anti-precedent than a precedent. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
When a DACA recipient who has been unlawfully present in the United States for a lengthy period of time leaves the United States to apply for an employment-based visa at a U.S. consulate abroad, they are likely to trigger the 3- or 10-year bars pursuant to INA § 212(a)(9)(B).Under INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) a person who is unlawfully present for more than 180 days but less than 1 year, and who voluntarily departs the US prior to the commencement of… [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 2:11 pm
In 2002, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:11 am
” Another pending case on point is United Therapeutics v. [read post]
