Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me."
Results 2721 - 2740
of 6,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
But what’s kind of interesting to me is how the sides align in this particular debate. [read post]
21 May 2008, 4:36 am
Connecticut (where the Court held that the state must waive court fees for poor people seeking a divorce) or Tennessee v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:50 pm
The Crown’s position, based on R. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:54 pm
The Crown’s position, based on R. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:52 pm
In the Oracle v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
Last week, we posted a highly unusual motion from Arizona. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
[/Update]On the second day of jury deliberations in the Apple v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
This morning the court granted Microsoft leave to file such a motion. the deadline for the motion is September 16, 2013 (next Monday), and Motorola can (and I'm sure will) respond a week later. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 2:58 am
The court obviously didn't provide any information to me on what the parties appear inclined to do next. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am
Don't blame me, I voted for Charlie BairdTravis County DA Rosemary Lehmberg was arrested for DWI last night. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:04 pm
The Swiss Raelian movement was represented by Me Elie Elkaim (Lausanne). [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
One stunning research report from Johns Hopkins stated that patient safety researchers estimated that surgeons in the United States leave foreign objects like sponges or towels or surgical tools inside a patient’s body after an operation 39 times a week. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
Concepcion and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:30 pm
” State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:59 pm
No avid reader of this blog would consider me to be hostile to defendants. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:34 am
But remember at the February 6 hearing in State Farm v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Doyle v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm
And his reference to hot dogs means it’s been a big sitting for that particular food, with Breyer’s hypotheticals last week in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
We've noted a number of such cases in recent weeks but take, for example, the recent decision of Cordy v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 2:08 pm
The issue in Navarette v. [read post]
