Search for: "West v. People" Results 2721 - 2740 of 3,466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
” The majority cited the Supreme Court’s 2003 opinion in Raytheon Co v Hernandez in support. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:17 am
And he rightly points out that it raises the potential for conflicting judgments in cases involving former Chadian dictator Habré -- not necessarily the 2009 decision of the African Court of Human and People's Rights about which we've posted, but rather the eventual judgment in Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:17 am by Steve Lombardi
— A mobile home fire in Grimes killed two pets Thursday night, but two people escaped unhurt. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:37 am by thejaghunter
$1.83 $3.104 69.6% Crude oil, European Brent (barrel) $43.48 $99.02 127.7% Crude oil, West TX Inter. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
"People like them because they're natural," Nesbitt said. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:15 am by Eric Muller
Sixty-nine years ago tomorrow, President Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, which authorized the military to set in motion a plan for the mass exclusion of people of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:15 am by Ray Dowd
Dowd from West here   tweetmeme_source = 'raydowd'; Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 5th Ed. 2010) by Raymond J. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Adam Wagner
In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] 1 FLR 224, HL the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) held that a girl under 16 could validly consent to contraception “provided that she has sufficient understanding and intelligence to know what they involve“. [read post]