Search for: "Adams v State"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 5,046
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
Modaresi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ … Court of Appeall: Statutory appeals *must* be on time, as no discretion to extend time under CPR. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:48 pm
Adams v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
SPEIGHT v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am
In Barton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:26 am
The Claimant objected, and stated that any substitution would be subject to approval by the Recipient. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
Bank v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 1:21 pm
The New York Times ' Adam Liptak has coverage of the argument here . [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 4:00 pm
v=ifX_JnBfxTY [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 4:30 am
The case is Estes v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:49 am
State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
For her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at the 1988 case Morrison v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 9:47 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:09 am
” At another point, however, citing United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:00 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
Marzen East Carolina University and Florida State University, SSRN. [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:56 am
Best known for establishing a national sex offender registry (of highly questionable fairness and effectiveness) and promulgating standards for state registries, the Adam Walsh Act also provided for the indefinite "civil commitment" of federal prisoners who have completed their sentences but are considered likely to commit sex offenses if released. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 5:43 am
Mirvis, Adam O. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 6:25 pm
Ilya Somin added another post at Volokh Conspiracy to the discussion of whether the AWA registration provisions run afoul of the Commerce Clause after Raich:In my earlier post on the federal district court decision striking down a part of the Adam Walsh Act as beyond Congress' powers under the Commerce Clause, I omitted a crucial additional reason why this legislation is valid under the Supreme Court's misguided 2005 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 5:43 am
Mirvis, Adam O. [read post]
