Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 9,055
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 7:01 pm
Supreme Court turns down case challenging Arizona’s death penalty. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:20 pm
Supreme Court has finally turned down the capital case of Hidalgo v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am
Seven months after an Arizona inmate asked the Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of the death penalty itself, the court today declined to do so. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:47 am
He appealed to the Supreme Court of Arizona, which upheld [opinion] the death sentence and found that the trial court properly denied Hidalgo's motion alleging the unconstitutionality of Arizona's death penalty statute without first holding an... [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:15 am
She received notification the day before the public announcement that she was going to be nominated by President Reagan to the Supreme Court, though she hadn’t known she was even a finalist for the position at the time. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
Supreme Court Upholds Arizona Supreme Court Same-Sex Custody Case Decision The U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
Defendant sought review by the Arizona Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 11:25 am
February 8, 2018), an insurance bad faith and equitable indemnification case arising from an auto claim, the Arizona Supreme Court answered a Certified Question from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and held that Arizona’s equitable indemnity law does not incorporate the First Restatement of Restitution § 78 because it conflicts with Arizona’s general equitable indemnity principles. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm
Munsingwear, Inc., the Supreme Court should vacate the U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
… BC Injury Law BlogPlaintiff Ordered to Pay Double Costs After Failed Parking Lot Collision Injury Claim Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Chilliwack Registry, ordering a Plaintiff to pay double costs after having a personal injury lawsuit dismissed. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:43 pm
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Arizona issued an opinion in an Arizona assault case requiring the court to review its longstanding decision not to allow a defendant to claim both self-defense and misidentification under the theory that the two are mutually exclusive. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:43 pm
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Arizona issued an opinion in an Arizona assault case requiring the court to review its longstanding decision not to allow a defendant to claim both self-defense and misidentification under the theory that the two are mutually exclusive. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm
Electrical lines along a Salt River Project canal The Supreme Court was set to hear argument on March 19 in Salt River Project v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
Supreme Court justices have become less like traditional inquisitors during oral arguments and more like advocates for their own positions, a reflection of a politically polarized Congress and society. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 2:32 pm
This phenomenon reared its head again when I was reading about a bus accident in Phoenix, Arizona that occurred Friday, March 2nd. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:40 am
United States, the Supreme Court ruled that federal immigration laws can often override state law even in cases where there is no direct conflict. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:10 am
Upon her death in 1994, the Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court commented: “She made history for the law in many ways. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am
In 2015, the Supreme Court held in Johnson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
While serving on the United States Supreme Court, he was tapped by President Harry Truman to be the lead prosecutor for the United States in the Nuremburg trials. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm
Thornton (1994), a Supreme Court divided 5-4 held that Arkansas could not add to the qualifications for election to Congress enumerated in the Constitution by disqualifying candidates who had already served a set number of terms in office; it also specifically rejected the view that a restriction on ballot access does not act as a bar to office because it leaves open the possibility of running as a write-in. [read post]
