Search for: "BELL v. STATE"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 3,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
The Art of the Family Law and Divorce Objections: Evidence and Procedure in California Family Law Proceedings and RFO Requests By: Michael C. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
The Court determines that the County of Nassau is not responsible for the cost of publication herein, as that is the sole responsibility of the State in that Section 1 of Article XVII of the State Constitution provides that this is a state charge as the same has not been delegated to the County, wherein the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed the lower court's holding that the City was responsible for the cost of publication and instead placed the… [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Bell was not entirely correct As many of you know, I think that Buck v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized their importance, describing links as an indispensable part of the Internet in the Crookes v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
Summary of the Fact This case concerned a class action initiated by a former employee, Morgan against Sundance Incorporate (the owner of a Taco Bell franchise restaurant, hereinafter “Company”) regarding the arrear of overtime payment in the context of Federal law of the USA. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:42 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
A. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
See Hicks v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 11:36 am
The Antitrust Pleading Standard Is Shifting Back Toward the Plaintiff TWOMBLY AND THE PLAUSIBILITY STANDARD For those not familiar with antitrust law, Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As a justice, his dissents in Lochner v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
Bell, supra note 5, at 1351-52. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:16 am
Come on CJEU, give us a decision which leads to a valid SPC....The AmeriKat is whiskers deep in papers at the moment, but she took a few minutes just now to have a look at this morning's latest SPC decision from the Court of Justice of the European Union in C-443/17 Abraxis v Comptroller General of Patents, which was subject to a referral made by Mr Justice Arnold on 16 March 2017 (see previous IPKat posts here). [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:04 am
Norwitz, Sabastian V. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
The decision is here: Barnes v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
In Sarl Louis Feraud International v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
Fiero v. [read post]
