Search for: "Bay v. State" Results 2741 - 2760 of 3,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2007, 12:42 pm
A third significant and publicly accessible case involves the constitutionality of a particular federal regulation of child pornography (United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am by Sarah Grant
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am by Sarah Grant
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm by Mark Zamora
This didn’t please the FDA, which sent a warning letter to AMARC, stating that since Poly-MVA isn’t FDA-approved, the customer testimonials essentially falsify the product as approved.Here's the letter:HomeInspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal InvestigationsEnforcement ActionsWarning LettersEnforcement ActionsWarning Letters2012-Amarc Enterprises 12/11/12Department of Health and Human ServicesPublic Health ServiceFood and Drug AdministrationLos Angeles… [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by Ritika Singh
In other news, the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:37 am by Steve Lubet
As Justice Kavanaugh explained in his powerful concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:26 am by Larry Siems, The Torture Report
Cassard stated that there were still four detainees that the ICRC had not been able to visit. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Here’s a story about this very thing from California, from Borgstrom v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:15 am by SHG
Except the Third Circuit held this mortification to state a sufficient claim to go to trial in Revock v. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]